Apr 20, 2021

The Strategic Importance of Leaving Afghanistan

Photograph Source: Gustavo Montes de Oca – CC BY 2.0

Sixty years ago, President Dwight D. Eisenhower articulated his concern about the ability of his presidential successors to control the military.  Several weeks before his Farewell Address, he gathered his senior advisers in the Oval Office of the White House and mused: “God help this country when someone sits in this chair who doesn’t know the military as well as I do.” By and large, the successors to Eisenhower have lacked military experience; they have been deferential to the military and have recklessly used military force to bolster their credentials.  This has been a key factor in the expanded power of the military establishment over foreign policy, national security policy, and the intelligence community.

Continue Reading on Counter Punch:

https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/04/20/the-strategic-importance-of-leaving-afghanistan/

Recent News and Latest Book

Bill Clinton’s Role in the Crisis Over Ukraine

Originally posed on CounterPunch The militarization of American foreign policy has evolved over the past thirty years. Ironically, this took place in the wake of the dissolution of the Soviet Union, which should have led to reassessing U.S. national security policy and defense spending.  Democratic presidents have played a major role in this militarization because…

KILL FILibuster

A Poem By Carolyn McGiffert Ekedahl
In two thousand and six, many Repubs had a soul
A unanimous vote to extend was the goal.
And they did it.  The Senators, both left and right,
Extended the Act giving voters their rights.

Containing the National Security State

Containing the National Security State